# Bayou Ballots

Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/stubborn-things-7595522/bayou-ballots
Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/stubborn-things-7595522/bayou-ballots.md
Podcast: [Stubborn Things](https://stenobird.com/podcast/stubborn-things-7595522)
Published: 2026-05-04T11:00:00+00:00
Episode link: https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm
Audio file: https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/78b983b4-a94f-450b-a2c3-6b4d656c633e.mp3
Processing state: not_requested
JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/stubborn-things-7595522/episodes/bayou-ballots
Duration seconds: 3476

## Resource

This week, Stubborn Things is laser-focused on the Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais . Our hosts discuss the history of the Voting Rights Act, as well as the Gingles test which the majority updated last week. Sean and Jay evaluate how far-reaching the Court’s decision will prove to be, and they correct some of the narratives that have emerged in the wake of the decision. What do they think of Justice Alito’s argumentation? What about Justice Kagan’s dissent? Take a listen to find out! Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X @aei_STpodcast . Comments? Suggestions? Email us at StubbornThings@aei.org . Show notes: Louisiana v. Callais Amy Coney Barrett’s Precedent and Jurisprudential Disagreement

## Actions

- request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/stubborn-things-7595522/episodes/bayou-ballots/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
- read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/stubborn-things-7595522/bayou-ballots.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed.

## Transcript

Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.