# Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts - Preview: Trump Can Fire (Almost) Anyone Now Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/slate-daily-feed-530620/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-preview-trump-can-fire-almost-anyone-now Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/slate-daily-feed-530620/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-preview-trump-can-fire-almost-anyone-now.md Podcast: [Slate Daily Feed](https://stenobird.com/podcast/slate-daily-feed-530620) Published: 2026-06-29T20:12:57+00:00 Episode link: https://shows.acast.com/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts/episodes/6a42cfeec2fe1c7f49d14455 Audio file: https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/695ea2381c1db1c5bdf7c59b/a/slatedailyfeed-podcasts/e/6a42cfeec2fe1c7f49d14455/media.mp3 Processing state: not_requested JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/slate-daily-feed-530620/episodes/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-preview-trump-can-fire-almost-anyone-now Duration seconds: 527 ## Resource The end is nigh! Or, the end of this Supreme Court term is nigh, at least.   On the second to last day of this term, the court’s right wingers delivered a sweeping ruling that will reshape the federal government for years to come. In Trump v. Slaughter , the conservative supermajority voted 6-3 to allow the president to fire members of independent regulatory agencies—overturning Humphrey's Executor , a 91-year-old unanimous precedent—and handing Trump effective control over agencies that regulate consumer protection, nuclear energy, union activity, mine safety, and more. But the Roberts majority weren’t quite ready to hand the nation’s credit card (and their investment portfolios) over to the mad king, and so the Federal Reserve got a carve-out in a separate 5-4 ruling in Trump v. Cook . How did they reach these wildly different conclusions in such closely related cases? Justice Roberts offered a barely argued rationale, but who needs a rationale if your red lines are painted in a crimson of pure cynicism? The court also handed down a significant Fourth Amendment ruling on geofence warrants , with Justice Kagan writing for a 6-3 majority that such warrants constitute a "search" under the Fourth Amendment.  And in Watson v. Republican National Committee , the court upheld state laws allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive shortly after. But the squeaker of a 5-4 majority was deeply alarming in a case that played to some of the justices’ fox-brained ideas about election fraud. Justice Alito and his fellow dissenters appear to have signed onto the wholly unsupported view that Democrat wins are always suspect, and the only way to restore trust in voting is to restrict voting. As Rick Hasen writes for Slate, we won’t b… ## Actions - request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/slate-daily-feed-530620/episodes/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-preview-trump-can-fire-almost-anyone-now/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode. - read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/slate-daily-feed-530620/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-preview-trump-can-fire-almost-anyone-now.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource. A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed. ## Transcript Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.