# EP#208 | She Recanted, Then Took It Back. Now What?

Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/not-on-record-podcast-5844918/ep-208-she-recanted-then-took-it-back-now-what
Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/not-on-record-podcast-5844918/ep-208-she-recanted-then-took-it-back-now-what.md
Podcast: [Not On Record Podcast](https://stenobird.com/podcast/not-on-record-podcast-5844918)
Published: 2026-04-13T01:00:07+00:00
Episode link: https://soundcloud.com/notonrecord/nor-208
Audio file: https://feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/2294682092-notonrecord-nor-208.mp3
Processing state: not_requested
JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/not-on-record-podcast-5844918/episodes/ep-208-she-recanted-then-took-it-back-now-what
Duration seconds: 1463

## Resource

Sponsored by EasyDNS Move your domain or web hosting to EasyDNS and support Not On Record: https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord Use promo code: notonrecord In this episode of Not On Record, criminal defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger and Diana Davison break down a fascinating Ontario appeal decision involving fresh evidence, recantation, no-contact orders, and the limits of the criminal justice system’s truth-seeking function. The case centers on a convicted man seeking to introduce post-conviction recordings in which the complainant allegedly recants her sexual assault allegations, only to later resile from that recantation when re-interviewed by police. The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed a narrowly tailored cross-examination of the complainant to help determine whether this fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal. This episode explores the legal and policy tension at the heart of the case: should potentially exculpatory evidence be excluded because it was obtained through conduct that may have breached a court order? The discussion also examines how no-contact orders work in practice, what happens when complainants repeatedly reach out to the accused, and why recantations in domestic violence and sexual assault cases are often treated with caution. Joseph and Diana also discuss real-world examples where complainants continued contacting accused persons through text messages, WhatsApp, voicemail, family members, and parenting communication platforms such as OurFamilyWizard. They look at how defence counsel should respond, what the Crown may infer from repeated unwanted contact, and how these communications can affect credibility, reliability, reasonable prospect of conviction, and public-interest decision-making. This is a sharp conversation about sexual assault appeals,…

## Actions

- request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/not-on-record-podcast-5844918/episodes/ep-208-she-recanted-then-took-it-back-now-what/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
- read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/not-on-record-podcast-5844918/ep-208-she-recanted-then-took-it-back-now-what.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed.

## Transcript

Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.