# Less Sex, More Text: Law Talk's 2025 Supreme Court Recap

Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/law-talk-with-epstein-yoo-cooke-250371/less-sex-more-text-law-talk-s-2025-supreme-court-recap
Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/law-talk-with-epstein-yoo-cooke-250371/less-sex-more-text-law-talk-s-2025-supreme-court-recap.md
Podcast: [Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke](https://stenobird.com/podcast/law-talk-with-epstein-yoo-cooke-250371)
Published: 2025-07-08T05:10:51+00:00
Episode link: https://www.spreaker.com/episode/less-sex-more-text-law-talk-s-2025-supreme-court-recap--66893159
Audio file: https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/66893159/law_talk_with_epstein_yoo_7_7_25.mp3
Processing state: not_requested
JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/law-talk-with-epstein-yoo-cooke-250371/episodes/less-sex-more-text-law-talk-s-2025-supreme-court-recap
Duration seconds: 4237

## Resource

Richard Epstein, John Yoo, and Charles C.W. Cooke unpack one of the most consequential Supreme Court terms in recent memory. From nationwide injunctions and the scope of presidential power, to parental rights, transgender medicine, and age verification laws, the trio dives deep into the constitutional, structural, and political implications of the Court’s major decisions and what it all means for American governance.

## Actions

- request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/law-talk-with-epstein-yoo-cooke-250371/episodes/less-sex-more-text-law-talk-s-2025-supreme-court-recap/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
- read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/law-talk-with-epstein-yoo-cooke-250371/less-sex-more-text-law-talk-s-2025-supreme-court-recap.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed.

## Transcript

Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.