# Concierra Legal Brings Constitutional Access Argument to Texas Supreme Court AI Deposition Case

Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/global-economic-press-7086730/concierra-legal-brings-constitutional-access-argument-to-texas-supreme-court-ai-deposition-case
Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/global-economic-press-7086730/concierra-legal-brings-constitutional-access-argument-to-texas-supreme-court-ai-deposition-case.md
Podcast: [Global Economic Press](https://stenobird.com/podcast/global-economic-press-7086730)
Published: 2026-09-22T20:01:17+00:00
Episode link: https://global-economic-press.podbean.com/e/concierra-legal-brings-constitutional-access-argument-to-texas-supreme-court-ai-deposition-case/
Audio file: https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/duyml79r8qquuyok/press_release_14841_1790107276.mp3
Processing state: not_requested
JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/global-economic-press-7086730/episodes/concierra-legal-brings-constitutional-access-argument-to-texas-supreme-court-ai-deposition-case
Duration seconds: 431

## Resource

In this episode of Global Economic Press, Alex Brady discusses a pivotal legal development in Texas that could redefine the use of technology in courtrooms. Concierra Legal, a Texas-based law firm, has filed an amicus curiae brief in the Supreme Court of Texas, advocating for the use of artificial intelligence in deposition transcripts. This case, In re Patrick Hughey, could significantly impact access to justice and the cost of legal proceedings. Concierra Legal's brief supports the Institute for Constitutional Artificial Intelligence Law's argument that less costly methods of recording and transcribing testimony should be permitted to ensure meaningful access to the courts. For more information about Concierra Legal, visit their website at ConcierraLegal.com. The brief emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance between technological advancements and the reliability of legal records. It argues that Texas procedural rules already allow for nonstenographic deposition methods, and courts should only require certified transcripts for good cause. The Institute for Constitutional Artificial Intelligence Law contends that preserving this balance aligns with the Texas Constitution's open-courts guarantee. Michelle May O'Neil, founder of Concierra Legal, highlights that the cost of creating a litigation record can determine whether someone can afford to pursue or defend a claim. The brief urges the Supreme Court of Texas to grant the petition for writ of mandamus, allowing the use of artificial intelligence-assisted transcripts while ensuring judicial oversight and reliability. This case underscores the intersection of appellate advocacy, artificial intelligence, and access to justice, areas in which Concierra Legal specializes.

## Actions

- request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/global-economic-press-7086730/episodes/concierra-legal-brings-constitutional-access-argument-to-texas-supreme-court-ai-deposition-case/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
- read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/global-economic-press-7086730/concierra-legal-brings-constitutional-access-argument-to-texas-supreme-court-ai-deposition-case.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed.

## Transcript

Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.