Episode
Are the Giants good or bad? Yes.
- Published
- Apr 10, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2740
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/giants-postcards-a-san-francisco-giants-podcast-7281929/episodes/are-the-giants-good-or-bad-yes/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/giants-postcards-a-san-francisco-giants-podcast-7281929/are-the-giants-good-or-bad-yes.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Connor Grossman and Kerry Crowley are back to break down a very Giants week—the kind where everything happens and none of it makes complete sense. Have a question you want answered on the show? Reach out at [email protected]. Connor and Kerry try to make sense of a team that looks lost one series and strong the next, and what it says about who they really are. They start with the highs, including Rafael Devers’ long-awaited breakthrough moment — a swing that finally felt like the reason he’s in San Francisco — before getting into the lows, headlined by a brutal decision by Matt Chapman that had Connor seeing red. From there, the guys dig into the bullpen uncertainty, early roster surprises like Daniel Susac’s emergence vs. Patrick Bailey’s struggles, and the challenge of covering a team that feels wildly inconsistent from game to game. Plus, a few early Tony Vitello observations. On today’s postcard: — Devers' biggest home run as a Giant (so far) (3:36) — How do you split time between Daniel Susac and Patrick Bailey? (9:44) — Who sets the lineup, Tony V or the front office? (15:21) — Why did Chapman try to steal second base? (22:05) — Landon Roupp deserved better (28:28) — Early reads on Tony V (32:23) Catch Kerry on KNBR and at the San Francisco Standard , subscribe to Connor’s newsletter at giantspostcards.com , and leave a rating and review — we’ll read it on the show.