Episode

CS: UT in or UT out? New July 2026 Data

Podcast
Dr. Chapa's OBGYN No Spin Podcast
Published
Jun 10, 2026
Duration seconds
912
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://rss.com/podcasts/dr-chapa-s-obgyn-no-spin-podcast/2901758
Audio
https://content.rss.com/episodes/337911/2901758/dr-chapa-s-obgyn-no-spin-podcast/2026_06_09_21_41_47_a5789dc7-660a-4e85-8615-bc686e2cbb7c.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/dr-chapa-s-obgyn-no-spin-podcast-7407953/episodes/cs-ut-in-or-ut-out-new-july-2026-data
Markdown
/podcast/dr-chapa-s-obgyn-no-spin-podcast-7407953/cs-ut-in-or-ut-out-new-july-2026-data.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/dr-chapa-s-obgyn-no-spin-podcast-7407953/episodes/cs-ut-in-or-ut-out-new-july-2026-data/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/dr-chapa-s-obgyn-no-spin-podcast-7407953/cs-ut-in-or-ut-out-new-july-2026-data.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Hey everyone, thanks for tuning in. If you’ve spent any time in the OR during a cesarean delivery, you know that the choice between uterine exteriorization and in situ repair usually comes down to how you were trained or personal surgeon preference. It’s a debate as old as modern obstetrics. But a major piece of clarity is coming down the pipeline. This episode, we are getting a sneak peek at a brand-new systematic review and meta-analysis dropping this July 2026 in the European Journal of OBGYN. We’re asking the big question: is this the study that finally settles the debate once and for all? Grab your coffee, stick around, and let’s find out. 16% OFF TONA ACTIVE WEAR PROMO: https://tonaactive.com/discount/CHAPANOSPINOBG 1. Coutinho, I. C., Ramos de Amorim, M. M., Katz, L., & Bandeira de Ferraz, Á. A. (2008). Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 111(3), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e31816521e2 . (One of the most heavily cited clinical trials on the subject. It established that women in the exteriorized group experienced a 41% greater risk of moderate-to-severe pain at 6 hours postoperatively compared to the non-exteriorized cohort). 2. Tan, H. S., Taylor, R. C., Sharawi, N., Sultana, R., Barton, K. D., & Habib, A. S. (2021). Uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair in Cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 69(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02142-8 3. Fonseca Queiroz L, Lemos M, Pereira da Silva D . Uterine exteriorization versus in-situ uterine repair during cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Obstetrics an…