Episode

When Vision Speaks for Sound

Podcast
Daily Paper Cast
Published
May 21, 2026
Duration seconds
1381
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://share.transistor.fm/s/726dcbfe
Audio
https://media.transistor.fm/726dcbfe/7eed5808.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/daily-paper-cast-7079649/episodes/when-vision-speaks-for-sound
Markdown
/podcast/daily-paper-cast-7079649/when-vision-speaks-for-sound.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daily-paper-cast-7079649/episodes/when-vision-speaks-for-sound/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daily-paper-cast-7079649/when-vision-speaks-for-sound.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

🤗 Upvotes: 89 | cs.CV, cs.SD Authors: Xiaofei Wen, Wenjie Jacky Mo, Xingyu Fu, Rui Cai, Tinghui Zhu, Wendi Li, Yanan Xie, Muhao Chen, Peng Qi Title: When Vision Speaks for Sound Arxiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16403v1 Abstract: Despite rapid progress in video-capable MLLMs, we find that their apparent audio understanding in videos is often vision-driven: models rely on visual cues to infer or hallucinate acoustic information, rather than verifying the audio stream. This issue appears across both state-of-the-art open-source omni models and leading closed-source models from providers such as Google and OpenAI. We characterize this failure mode as an audio-visual Clever Hans effect, in which models appear (falsely) audio-grounded, but actually exploit visual-acoustic correlations without verifying whether the audio and visual streams are truly aligned. To systematically study this behavior, we introduce Thud, an intervention-driven probing framework based on three counterfactual audio edits: Shift, which tests temporal synchronization; Mute, which tests sound existence; and Swap, which tests audio-visual consistency. Beyond diagnosis, we further study a two-stage alignment recipe: intervention-derived preference pairs teach audio verification, while event-level general video preferences regularize the model against over-specialization. Our best 10K-sample recipe improves average performance across the three intervention dimensions by 28 percentage points, while slightly improving performance on general video and audio-visual QA benchmarks.