# Chullin 81 - July 20, 6 Av

Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-81-july-20-6-av
Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-81-july-20-6-av.md
Podcast: [Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran](https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456)
Published: 2026-07-20T05:15:00+00:00
Episode link: https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-81/
Audio file: https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hadran/Chullin81.mp3?dest-id=1768700
Processing state: not_requested
JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-81-july-20-6-av
Duration seconds: 2760

## Resource

Rav Hamnuna states in the name of Rabbi Shimon that the prohibition of oto v'et beno does not apply to consecrated animals ( kodashim ). This is based on Rabbi Shimon's principle that an invalid slaughter is not halakhically considered a slaughter ( shechita she'eina reuya lo shema shechita ), and since the meat of a sacrifice is not permitted for consumption until its blood is sprinkled, the slaughter itself is initially unfit. Rava challenges this using a text discussing various combinations of slaughtering consecutive sacrifices inside or outside the Temple courtyard ( bifnim or bachutz ), tracing the respective liabilities of karet and negative prohibitions under the views of Rabbi Shimon and the Rabbis. To resolve the contradiction, Rava explains that Rabbi Shimon does acknowledge the prohibition for kodashim , but holds that one does not receive lashes for it because the warning given at the time of slaughter is a doubtful warning ( hatra'at safek ), as the validity of the slaughter depends on the future sprinkling of the blood, and a doubtful warning is legally invalid. The Mishna states that if one slaughters an animal and it is found to be a treifa , or slaughters it for idolatry, as a Red Heifer, an ox convicted to be stoned, or a broken-necked heifer, Rabbi Shimon exempts him from the prohibition of oto v'et beno because the slaughter is invalid since the animal is not permitted for consumption, while the Rabbis declare him liable. However, if the slaughter itself is physically disqualified, such as if the animal becomes a carcass during the shechita process or if one stabbed the animal, all agree he is exempt. Reish Lakish establishes the Mishna's liability (according to the Rabbis' position) for idolatry only when the first animal was slaughtered for idola…

## Actions

- request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-81-july-20-6-av/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
- read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-81-july-20-6-av.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed.

## Transcript

Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.