# Chullin 78 - July 17, 3 Av

Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-78-july-17-3-av
Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-78-july-17-3-av.md
Podcast: [Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran](https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456)
Published: 2026-07-17T05:20:00+00:00
Episode link: https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-78/
Audio file: https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hadran/Chullin78.mp3?dest-id=1768700
Processing state: not_requested
JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-78-july-17-3-av
Duration seconds: 2822

## Resource

The Gemara discusses the prohibition of slaughtering an animal and its offspring on the same day ( oto v'et beno ). The Mishna presents various permutations of non-sacred animals ( chullin ) and consecrated sacrifices slaughtered either inside or outside the Temple courtyard, outlining the respective punishments incurred and the halakhic status of the meat. A braita derives from biblical verses that this prohibition applies to consecrated animals, and the Gemara subsequently demonstrates that it applies to non-consecrated animals as well. Since the laws of oto v'et beno are learned from consecrated animals, the Gemara questions why the prohibition also applies to crossbreeds ( kilayim ), which are unfit for the Altar. This is resolved by explaining that the word "or" ( o ) in the verse serves to include crossbreeds. This explanation raises a difficulty, as the word "or" should be needed to teach that one is liable for slaughtering either an ox or a sheep with its offspring, rather than needing to slaughter both to violate the prohibition. The Gemara resolves this by pointing to the singular word "its" ( oto ), which teaches individual liability. Alternatively, according to Chananya - who uses the word "its" to include male parents in the prohibition - it is already self-evident that one is liable for either animal individually, in accordance with Rabbi Yonatan's interpretive principle regarding the biblical prohibition of cursing one's parents. This discussion leads to a discussion about the dispute between Chananya and the Rabbis r regarding whether the prohibition of oto v'et beno applies to both the father and mother, or exclusively to the mother.

## Actions

- request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-78-july-17-3-av/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
- read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-78-july-17-3-av.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed.

## Transcript

Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.