# Chullin 16 - Shabbat May 16, 29 Iyar Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-16-shabbat-may-16-29-iyar Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-16-shabbat-may-16-29-iyar.md Podcast: [Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran](https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456) Published: 2026-05-15T05:30:00+00:00 Episode link: https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-16/ Audio file: https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hadran/Chullin16.mp3?dest-id=1768700 Processing state: not_requested JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-16-shabbat-may-16-29-iyar Duration seconds: 2401 ## Resource The Gemara brings a braita to prove that Rebbi differentiates between a slaughter performed with an item attached to the ground and one performed with an item that was originally detached but later became attached. An internal contradiction within the braita is resolved by applying this distinction. The Gemara then delves into the specific cases within the braita. First, it addresses slaughtering using a mechanism. After raising a contradiction from a different braita that rules such a slaughter invalid, the conflict is resolved by distinguishing between a mechanism operated directly by human action and one that functions without human intervention or is only very indirectly affected by it. Rava discusses whether an item that was detached and subsequently re-attached to the ground is legally considered "attached" or "detached" across various areas of halakha - idol worship, susceptibility to impurity, and slaughtering. He notes that regarding idol worship, it is considered detached. Regarding impurity, it is subject to a tannaitic debate. Regarding slaughter, however, he remains unsure. The Gemara cites three quotes from the previously mentioned braita to resolve the status for slaughter, but each proof is ultimately deemed inconclusive. Shmuel limits a ruling in the braita - concerning slaughtering with a knife stuck in a wall - to a case where the animal is positioned below the knife. However, a contradictory braita is brought that makes no distinction regarding whether the animal is above or below. Two possible resolutions are suggested. Rav Chisda (or a braita) discusses five laws involving a reed stalk, forbidding its use in various activities due to the risk of splinters. One of these laws states that one cannot slaughter with it, which contradicts another source… ## Actions - request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-16-shabbat-may-16-29-iyar/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode. - read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-16-shabbat-may-16-29-iyar.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource. A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed. ## Transcript Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.