Episode

The Think Tank New Breed (IFP + FAI)

Podcast
ChinaTalk
Published
Apr 16, 2026
Duration seconds
4080
Processing state
processed
Canonical source
https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/CHTAL8666914835.mp3
Audio
https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/CHTAL8666914835.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/chinatalk-418044/episodes/the-think-tank-new-breed-ifp-fai
Markdown
/podcast/chinatalk-418044/the-think-tank-new-breed-ifp-fai.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/chinatalk-418044/episodes/the-think-tank-new-breed-ifp-fai/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/chinatalk-418044/the-think-tank-new-breed-ifp-fai.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Caleb Watney (Institute for Progress) and Max Bodach (Foundation for American Innovation) on what the new breed of DC think tanks does differently and why the old model is broken. We discuss: Why "counterfactual policy impact" matters more than white papers and what's wrong with project-based funding Cross-partisanship vs. picking sides: IFP pulls the rope sideways, FAI builds a big tent on the right Vertical integration over specialization — the person who wrote the brief should be the one selling it on the Hill Whether AI eats the think tank or just the parts that weren't working anyway Timestamps 00:38 — Applied think tank vs. white paper mill 16:56 — Partisanship: FAI's conservative tent vs. IFP's cross-partisan design 37:09 — Why researchers should do their own comms and outreach 50:26 — Betting on young talent as policy entrepreneurs 57:56 — Will AI eat the think tank? song: https://suno.com/s/I244K1rIpPdB6lO9 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices