Episode

The Flaws of Rent Ceilings

Podcast
Cato Podcast
Published
Mar 26, 2026
Duration seconds
2527
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://www.cato.org/multimedia/cato-podcast/flaws-rent-ceilings
Audio
https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5e28e0d8963f166217546493/e/69c41df6938a3e00374a7852/media.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/cato-podcast-516193/episodes/the-flaws-of-rent-ceilings
Markdown
/podcast/cato-podcast-516193/the-flaws-of-rent-ceilings.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/cato-podcast-516193/episodes/the-flaws-of-rent-ceilings/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/cato-podcast-516193/the-flaws-of-rent-ceilings.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Massachusetts is weighing a ballot initiative that would cap rent increases at the rate of inflation with no vacancy decontrol, one of the most stringent rent control regimes proposed in the country. Cato's Ryan Bourne and Jeff Miron walk through why economists are nearly unanimous in opposing rent control: it shrinks rental supply, degrades housing quality, and tends to benefit longer-term, higher-income tenants rather than the low-income renters it claims to help. As Cambridge's own history shows, the policy doesn't just fail to solve the affordability problem; it actively makes it worse. We want to hear from you! Please share your thoughts in a  3-minute anonymous survey  to help us refine our programming at Cato.org/PodcastSurvey . Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.