Episode

A Cruel Deception?

Podcast
Animal Rights: the Debate
Published
May 15, 2025
Duration seconds
1797
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://8455740d-a913-453b-a5ed-20f522efd647.libsyn.com/a-cruel-deception
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/8455740d-a913-453b-a5ed-20f522efd647/riverside_copy_of_rachel_david_pandora_1st_podcast.mp3?dest-id=4223538
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/animal-rights-the-debate-6705712/episodes/a-cruel-deception
Markdown
/podcast/animal-rights-the-debate-6705712/a-cruel-deception.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/animal-rights-the-debate-6705712/episodes/a-cruel-deception/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/animal-rights-the-debate-6705712/a-cruel-deception.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

In this episode, we talk to Pandora Pound of Safer Medicine (UK) and Rachel Smith of Animal Free Research Advocacy (Australia), about the reliability (or otherwise) of research using animals and how researchers got hooked on using animals despite highly questionable results. What are the economic and other pressures? Do animal models, artificially creating human diseases in (non-human) animals, actually work? In contentious areas, how should one guard against confirmation bias – the temptation to cherry-pick data which fits one's ethical position? Donate here: https://ko-fi.com/animalrightsdebate Join the WhatsApp community: https://chat.whatsapp.com/LTGteTLZkwI9XUtB1Xxfen Find out more: https://linktr.ee/animalrightsdebate