# The Myth of John Roberts vs. Donald Trump Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-512420/the-myth-of-john-roberts-vs-donald-trump Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-512420/the-myth-of-john-roberts-vs-donald-trump.md Podcast: [Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts](https://stenobird.com/podcast/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-512420) Published: 2026-05-30T07:00:00+00:00 Episode link: https://shows.acast.com/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts/episodes/6a1a027ff7ef7759589a6af8 Audio file: https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/695ea2381c1db1c5bdf7c59b/e/6a1a027ff7ef7759589a6af8/media.mp3 Processing state: not_requested JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-512420/episodes/the-myth-of-john-roberts-vs-donald-trump Duration seconds: 3861 ## Resource Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern, Slate’s dynamic legal duo, preview the final weeks of the Supreme Court term. It’s a “three-ring circus”: the merits docket, the shadow docket, and the justices’ increasingly public intramural snipings and gripes. Dahlia and Mark take a look back at the major decisions the court has issued so far this term on global tariffs, conversion therapy for LGBTQ minors, and of course Callais , which gutted the Voting Rights Act and is supercharging gerrymandering ahead of the midterms. Then, Dahlia and Mark look ahead to the blockbuster decisions expected in the coming weeks: birthright citizenship, immigration cases involving temporary protected status and green card holders, executive power fights over the firing of the Fed’s Lisa Cook and independent agency officials, and election cases that could dramatically change campaign finance laws and the counting of mail-in ballots. Next, they explain the court’s flurry of opaque shadow docket orders—and what it means for immigration enforcement, to impoundment, trans rights, access to abortion medication, and redistricting.  Finally, Dahlia and Mark parse the leaks and personal attacks that have spilled out into public from the usually tight-lipped confines of One First Street, and why this Supreme Court is fueling a newfound appetite for court reform among Americans. This is part of Opinionpalooza , Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court. The best way to support our work is by joining Slate Plus . (If you are already a member, consider a donation or merch !) Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly f… ## Actions - request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-512420/episodes/the-myth-of-john-roberts-vs-donald-trump/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode. - read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-512420/the-myth-of-john-roberts-vs-donald-trump.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource. A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed. ## Transcript Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.