# The Ontological Argument: What's Real & Not in Artificial Intelligence in LegalTech Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/adventures-in-legal-tech-3199639/the-ontological-argument-what-s-real-not-in-artificial-intelligence-in-legaltech Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/adventures-in-legal-tech-3199639/the-ontological-argument-what-s-real-not-in-artificial-intelligence-in-legaltech.md Podcast: [Adventures In Legal Tech](https://stenobird.com/podcast/adventures-in-legal-tech-3199639) Published: 2026-05-25T09:00:00+00:00 Episode link: https://atlnonevent.libsyn.com/the-ontological-argument-whats-real-not-in-artificial-intelligence-in-legaltech Audio file: https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/atlnonevent/ALT186_mixdown.mp3?dest-id=2697710 Processing state: not_requested JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/adventures-in-legal-tech-3199639/episodes/the-ontological-argument-what-s-real-not-in-artificial-intelligence-in-legaltech Duration seconds: 1562 ## Resource SUMMARY Teo Doremus traded a litigation desk in China for a startup in San Francisco, and along the way he became convinced that the legal industry's AI moment is right now. On this episode, Teo makes the case for starting an AI-native law firm, walks through how he thinks about hallucination risk, and explains the "digital desk" concept behind Advocacy, a platform built to connect the narrative silos of litigation that have historically lived in Microsoft Word and nowhere else. Teo also shares what he got wrong about law practice, why he thinks lawyers misunderstand what AI actually does when it "helps" them, and draws the most useful analogy you will hear about what lawyers get paid for in an AI world. The pilot and the autopilot are not enemies. Neither are lawyers and AI. The question is figuring out who does what. KEY TAKEAWAYS Start building your AI-native practice now. The advantage goes to whoever gets comfortable with the technology first, not whoever waits for it to be perfect. Before deploying AI in your firm, learn what it actually is and what it is not. Understanding its fundamental limitations is your best defense against hallucinations. AI adoption in law is high on subscriptions and low on genuine daily use. Real adoption means using AI regularly enough that it changes how you work, not just having a login. Specialized legal AI tools and general AI tools are not competitors. Use both strategically depending on how much precision your task requires. The lawyer's value in an AI-assisted practice looks like the pilot who no longer holds the stick for seventeen hours: rested, prepared, and ready for whatever the automation cannot handle. WHO IS THE GUEST? Teo Doremus is the CEO and co-founder of Advocacy, a litigation-focused AI platform built around what h… ## Actions - request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/adventures-in-legal-tech-3199639/episodes/the-ontological-argument-what-s-real-not-in-artificial-intelligence-in-legaltech/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode. - read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/adventures-in-legal-tech-3199639/the-ontological-argument-what-s-real-not-in-artificial-intelligence-in-legaltech.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource. A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed. ## Transcript Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.