Episode
Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke: A Fresh Assault on the Synoptic Problem, Part I (Ad Navseam, Episode 201)
- Podcast
- Ad Navseam
- Published
- Nov 18, 2025
- Duration seconds
- 3609
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://adnavseam.podbean.com/e/ad-navseam-episode-201/
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/ad-navseam-1368151/episodes/redating-matthew-mark-and-luke-a-fresh-assault-on-the-synoptic-problem-part-i-ad-navseam-episode-201/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/ad-navseam-1368151/redating-matthew-mark-and-luke-a-fresh-assault-on-the-synoptic-problem-part-i-ad-navseam-episode-201.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
This week the guys dive into John Wenham’s intriguing 1992 book Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke: A Fresh Assault on the Synoptic Problem. As they unpack the dense argument, see how Wenham challenges the generally accepted order of the synoptic gospel accounts (supposedly Mark and the mysterious “Q” come first) as well as the generally accepted “late” dates for each (beginning in the 60s-70s at the earliest). Using close comparative readings as well as placing the texts in a strict historical context, Wenham builds a case for the traditional, patristic chronological order of the gospels as well as dates much closer to the events of the life of Christ. So, get your pericopes in order and be prepared to rethink everything you thought you knew about “oral tradition.”