Episode
Forgers and Critics: Anthony Grafton and the History of Faking It (Ad Navseam, Episode 206)
- Podcast
- Ad Navseam
- Published
- Jan 9, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 4096
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/ad-navseam-1368151/episodes/forgers-and-critics-anthony-grafton-and-the-history-of-faking-it-ad-navseam-episode-206/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/ad-navseam-1368151/forgers-and-critics-anthony-grafton-and-the-history-of-faking-it-ad-navseam-episode-206.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Porphyry, Isaac Casaubon, and Richard Rietzenstein walk into a bar. Well, that's not true, seeing that they were separated from each other by hundreds of years. But if they did, they would be talking about the Corpus Hermeticum, that mysterious forged document that dates to the Hellenistic era, and claimed to have been written by "Hermes Thrice-great" (the Triple-decker). Thanks to the brilliant work of Guggenheim fellow and all-around savant Anthony Grafton, Jeff and Dave have the opportunity this week to tease out the differences between forgers and literary critics. Digging through chapter 3 of Grafton's 1990 work, the guys show how Porphyry (third century A.D.), Casaubon (16th century), and Reitzenstein (20th century) each tackle this forgery from a different angle, united in their quest for the truth and using some of the same tools. But as it turns out, are truth and falsehood more closely linked than at first they may appear? And do we have something to learn from the forgers and their methods? Tune in to find out.